MCP Simple Arxiv vs Brightdata MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Simple Arxiv and Brightdata MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Simple Arxiv when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Title and abstract search, Submission date filtering, Relevance and date sorting.

Explore MCP Simple Arxiv Details

Choose Brightdata MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Freemium).
• You have access to required keys: API_TOKEN.
• Primary tools included: GROUPS, TOOLS, search_engine.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Simple Arxiv andybrandt Search & Data Extraction	Brightdata MCP luminati-io Search & Data Extraction
Summary	MCP for LLM to search and read papers from arXiv	Discover, extract, and interact with the web - one interface powering automated access across the public internet.
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "andybrandt-mcp-simple-arxiv": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-simple-arxiv"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "luminati-io-brightdata-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@brightdata/mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "API_TOKEN": "YOUR_API_TOKEN_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons