MCP Simple Arxiv vs MCP Paperswithcode

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Simple Arxiv and MCP Paperswithcode MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Simple Arxiv when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Title and abstract search, Submission date filtering, Relevance and date sorting.

Explore MCP Simple Arxiv Details

Choose MCP Paperswithcode when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Paper search with title, abstract, and arXiv ID filters, Paper metadata and readable URL-based extraction, Linked results, tasks, methods, datasets, and repositories.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Simple Arxiv andybrandt Search & Data Extraction	MCP Paperswithcode hbg Search & Data Extraction
Summary	MCP for LLM to search and read papers from arXiv	MCP to search through PapersWithCode API
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "andybrandt-mcp-simple-arxiv": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-simple-arxiv"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hbg-mcp-paperswithcode": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "hbg-mcp-paperswithcode"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons