MCPSpend vs Spanlens

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
M
MCPSpend
andreisirbu91-lab
📊 Monitoring
S
Spanlens
spanlens
📊 Monitoring
SummaryReal-time cost observability for MCP tool calls. Transparent proxy auto-detects every MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, Claude Code, Zed, Continue.dev, Cline, Goose) and attributes spend per tool, per project, per end-customer. npx @mcpspend/proxy add install. Free tier 25K calls/month, no card. MIT proxy on npm. EU-hosted, GDPR-ready.Query Spanlens LLM observability from Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Continue: request logs, costs, agent traces, anomalies, and user analytics with a read-only API key.
Quality signal25/100 (Emerging)23/100 (Emerging)
Install pathnpx · highnpx · low
Engagement 2 0 0 1 0 0 11
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView MCPSpendView Spanlens
More alternatives to MCPSpendMore alternatives to SpanlensMonitoring category

Other servers like MCPSpend