Amz Vault vs ComOS Federation Gateway

In-depth architectural comparison of the Amz Vault and ComOS Federation Gateway MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Amz Vault when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the E-Commerce domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (Paid Service).
• Primary tools included: account_feedback, account_health_check, account_help.

Explore Amz Vault Details

Choose ComOS Federation Gateway when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the E-Commerce domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ComOS Federation Gateway Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Amz Vault VerifiedE-Commerce	ComOS Federation Gateway E-Commerce
Summary	AMZ Vault connects Amazon Seller Central and Amazon Advertising to any MCP client. Settlement-accurate P&L - every fee, refund and reimbursement as Amazon actually posted it - plus full Sponsored Products, Brands and Display management, SQP and Brand Analytics, inventory and per-ASIN forecasting. 114 tools: 79 read-only, 29 staged writes. Every Amazon-touching change stages a reviewable diff and reaches Amazon only when you confirm it. There is no autonomous-write mode. $99 flat, 14-day trial.	Multi-tenant MCP gateway for AI commerce. One connection, every store.

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "amz-vault": {
      "url": "https://www.amz-vault.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "comos-federation-gateway-2": {
      "url": "https://mcp.comos-gateway.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons