Amazon DSP MCP Server vs CiteHawk

In-depth architectural comparison of the Amazon DSP MCP Server and CiteHawk MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Amazon DSP MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Amazon DSP MCP Server Details

C

Choose CiteHawk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore CiteHawk Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Amazon DSP MCP Server Marketing	C CiteHawk Marketing
Summary	Amazon DSP management — CRUD, async reports, targeting, and audience management	AI-search visibility (GEO) analytics: brand scores, competitor rankings, recommendations, evidence.
Category & Scope	Marketing	Marketing
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "amazon-dsp-mcp-server": {
      "url": "https://gads.your-domain.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "citehawk": {
      "url": "https://www.citehawk.com/docs/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons