Supabase Mcp Server vs Read Only Local Postg… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Supabase Mcp Server vs Read Only Local Postgres Mcp Server
In-depth architectural comparison of the Supabase Mcp Server and Read Only Local Postgres Mcp Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Supabase Mcp Server
Databases · Local stdio
Quality: 48/100 (Fair) | Auth: API Key required
Read Only Local Postgres Mcp Server
Databases · Local stdio
Quality: 52/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Supabase Mcp Server if you need specialized Databases tools running via a local process. Choose Read Only Local Postgres Mcp Server if your workspace requires Databases integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Supabase Mcp Server when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
You have access to required keys: SUPABASE_PROJECT_REF, SUPABASE_DB_PASSWORD, SUPABASE_REGION, SUPABASE_ACCESS_TOKEN, SUPABASE_SERVICE_ROLE_KEY, QUERY_API_KEY.
Supabase Mcp Server is categorized under Databases and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Read Only Local Postgres Mcp Server belongs to Databases using local stdio subprocess. Select Supabase Mcp Server when you need capabilities focused on databases and Read Only Local Postgres Mcp Server when you require tools for databases.