A side-by-side look at the Context Firewall and Context Proxy MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Context Firewall for aggregators work as a local process; choose Context Proxy for aggregators as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Context Firewall when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Aggregators domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Context Proxy tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Context Firewall is categorized under Aggregators and uses a local stdio subprocess. Context Proxy belongs to Aggregators and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Context Firewall for aggregators work and Context Proxy for aggregators.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Context Firewall is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. Context Proxy has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add alepha188838884-context-firewall and context-proxy as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Context Firewall has a quality signal of 56/100 (Good) with 3 views, 0 installs and 2 GitHub stars. Context Proxy has 35/100 (Fair) with 1 views, 0 installs and 1 GitHub stars.