What is the key difference between AIppocampus and Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp?

AIppocampus belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution.

How do I install AIppocampus or Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are AIppocampus and Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp free or paid?

AIppocampus operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

AIppocampus lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp lists 0 tools with 0 views and 3 GitHub stars.

Can I use both AIppocampus and Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install AIppocampus or Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are AIppocampus and Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp free to use, or do they require API keys?

AIppocampus is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both AIppocampus and Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both aippocampus and shanghai-library-open-data-mcp as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, AIppocampus has a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp holds a Quality Score of 40 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 3 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

AIppocampus vs Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp

In-depth architectural comparison of the AIppocampus and Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

AIppocampus

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose AIppocampus if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AIppocampus when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AIppocampus Details

Choose Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A AIppocampus Developer Tools	S Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp Developer Tools
Summary	Local-first, source-backed continuity for AI agents via stdio MCP.	上海图书馆开放数据检索 MCP：纪年/家谱/建筑/红色事件/97 个 webapi + 搜韵诗词，支持 stdio 与 HTTP。
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

AIppocampus Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

AIppocampus Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aippocampus": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "aippocampus"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shanghai-library-open-data-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "shanghai-library-open-data-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

AIppocampus is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select AIppocampus when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to AIppocampus More alternatives to Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp Developer Tools category hub

Related MCP Server Comparisons

Popular comparisons with AIppocampus

Popular comparisons with Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp

W
Shanghai Library Open Data Mcp vs Windows MCP