What is the key difference between AIppocampus and Reviewable Artifacts?

AIppocampus belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Reviewable Artifacts belongs to the Developer Tools category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install AIppocampus or Reviewable Artifacts in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are AIppocampus and Reviewable Artifacts free or paid?

AIppocampus operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Reviewable Artifacts operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

AIppocampus lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Reviewable Artifacts lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both AIppocampus and Reviewable Artifacts together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install AIppocampus or Reviewable Artifacts in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are AIppocampus and Reviewable Artifacts free to use, or do they require API keys?

AIppocampus is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Reviewable Artifacts operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both AIppocampus and Reviewable Artifacts at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both aippocampus and reviewable-artifacts as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, AIppocampus has a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. Reviewable Artifacts holds a Quality Score of 41 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

AIppocampus vs Reviewable Artifacts

In-depth architectural comparison of the AIppocampus and Reviewable Artifacts MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

AIppocampus

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Reviewable Artifacts

Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose AIppocampus if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Reviewable Artifacts if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AIppocampus when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AIppocampus Details

Choose Reviewable Artifacts when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Reviewable Artifacts Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A AIppocampus Developer Tools	R Reviewable Artifacts Developer Tools
Summary	Local-first, source-backed continuity for AI agents via stdio MCP.	Reviewable workspace discovery and private HTML review creation via stdio MCP.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

AIppocampus Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Reviewable Artifacts Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

AIppocampus Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aippocampus": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "aippocampus"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Reviewable Artifacts Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "reviewable-artifacts": {
      "url": "https://bereviewable.com/agents"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

AIppocampus is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Reviewable Artifacts belongs to Developer Tools using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select AIppocampus when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Reviewable Artifacts when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to AIppocampus More alternatives to Reviewable Artifacts Developer Tools category hub

Related MCP Server Comparisons

Popular comparisons with AIppocampus

Popular comparisons with Reviewable Artifacts

Reviewable Artifacts vs Mcp