Agentbridge vs Slipstream

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agentbridge and Slipstream MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Agentbridge when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Agentbridge Details

S

Choose Slipstream when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Slipstream Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Agentbridge Developer Tools	S Slipstream Developer Tools
Summary	Control Classic Mac OS (System 7-9) from AI agents via shared folder protocol.	Shared distillation cache for AI agents — every fetch ~73-89% fewer tokens via a shared cache.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentbridge": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "classic-mac-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "slipstream": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "slipstream"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons