Agent MCP Gateway vs SpendNod

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agent MCP Gateway and SpendNod MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose Agent MCP Gateway when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Agent MCP Gateway Details

Choose SpendNod when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SpendNod Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A Agent MCP Gateway Developer Tools	SpendNod Developer Tools
Summary	On-demand tool discovery for all your MCPs and per-subagent MCP controls to preserve context window.	Human authorization gateway for AI agent transactions
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agent-mcp-gateway": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "agent-mcp-gateway"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "spendnod": {
      "url": "https://api.spendnod.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons