In-depth architectural comparison of the AEO Audit and Amazon DSP MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
AEO Audit
Marketing · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 35/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Amazon DSP MCP Server
Marketing · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose AEO Audit if you need specialized Marketing tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Amazon DSP MCP Server if your workspace requires Marketing integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
A
Choose AEO Audit when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
AEO Audit is categorized under Marketing and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Amazon DSP MCP Server belongs to Marketing using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select AEO Audit when you need capabilities focused on marketing and Amazon DSP MCP Server when you require tools for marketing.