ActableSite AI Crawler Monitor vs Nace MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the ActableSite AI Crawler Monitor and Nace MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ActableSite AI Crawler Monitor when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: audit_public_website, check_ai_crawler_policy, get_crawler_watch_offer.

Explore ActableSite AI Crawler Monitor Details

Choose Nace MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Nace MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	ActableSite AI Crawler Monitor Search & Data Extraction	Nace MCP Search & Data Extraction
Summary	Check AI crawler robots.txt policy and monitor public-site policy, sitemap, and llms.txt changes.	Browse, search and fuzzy-match NACE Rev. 2.1 economic activity classification codes.
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "actablesite-ai-crawler-monitor": {
      "url": "https://actablesite.com/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nace-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "nace-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons