Google Search Console… vs MCP Gtm Tech Stack Si… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Google Search Console MCP vs MCP Gtm Tech Stack Signal Scraper
In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Search Console MCP and MCP Gtm Tech Stack Signal Scraper MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Google Search Console MCP
Marketing · Local stdio
Quality: 61/100 (Good) | Auth: OAuth 2.0
MCP Gtm Tech Stack Signal Scraper
Marketing · Local stdio
Quality: 57/100 (Good) | Auth: API Key required
Verdict Summary: Choose Google Search Console MCP if you need specialized Marketing tools running via a local process. Choose MCP Gtm Tech Stack Signal Scraper if your workspace requires Marketing integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Google Search Console MCP when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (Free / Open Source).
You have access to required keys: GSC_CLIENT_ID, GSC_CLIENT_SECRET, GSC_REFRESH_TOKEN.
Google Search Console MCP server: query performance data, inspect URLs, check indexing, and generate brandable HTML SEO audit reports with a 30/60/90-day roadmap. Read-only OAuth scope, installable via uvx mcp-google-search-console.
Detects a company CRM, sequencer, and marketing automation from its public website. Clay-ready.
Which properties can this account read, and in what exact format
gsc_site_details
Permission level and type for one property
gsc_query
The Search Analytics report, with filters, dimensions and pagination
gsc_performance_overview
Is the site up or down, against the previous period
gsc_compare_periods
What changed between two periods, ranked by click delta
gsc_quick_wins
Queries close enough to the top that a push would pay off
gsc_ctr_gaps
Pages that rank but are not clicked
gsc_cannibalization
Queries where several pages compete against each other
gsc_traffic_drops
Pages that lost clicks, with a likely cause for each
gsc_content_decay
Pages sliding down month after month
gsc_alerts
What moved sharply enough to be worth a message today
gsc_portfolio
Every property at a glance, worst first
+5 more tools listed on main page
MCP Gtm Tech Stack Signal Scraper Tools (1)
detect_gtm_tech_stack
Detect which GTM tools a company uses from its public-facing website. Returns CRM, sequencer, and marketing automation signals as a flat, Clay-ready JSON row, with per-tool boolean flags for HubSpot, Salesforce, Apollo, Gong, Intercom, and Marketo, plus a composite tech stack signal. Pass technologies to narrow the answer to named tools. Read-only; requires an APIFY_TOKEN and consumes Apify credits per call.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Google Search Console MCP is categorized under Marketing and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, MCP Gtm Tech Stack Signal Scraper belongs to Marketing using local stdio subprocess. Select Google Search Console MCP when you need capabilities focused on marketing and MCP Gtm Tech Stack Signal Scraper when you require tools for marketing.