Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
7timer vs Soilgrids
In-depth architectural comparison of the 7timer and Soilgrids MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
7timer
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 20/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Soilgrids
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 23/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose 7timer if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Soilgrids if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
7
Choose 7timer when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
S
Choose Soilgrids when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
7timer Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Soilgrids Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
7timer Configuration
Soilgrids Configuration