Unfour vs Reactuse

In-depth architectural comparison of the Unfour and Reactuse MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Unfour when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Delivery domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Unfour Details

Choose Reactuse when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Delivery domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Discovers ReactUse hook signatures, Provides hook usage patterns, References interactive hook demos.

Explore Reactuse Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Unfour zyqzyq Delivery	Reactuse childrentime Delivery
Summary	Local-first backend developer workspace exposing API debugging, SSH, database, workspace, and diagnostics tools to AI agents through a local MCP server, with workspace-scoped safety policies and confirmation for risky actions.	MCP server for the ReactUse library — 110+ React Hooks (TypeScript-first, SSR-compatible, tree-shakable). Lets AI assistants discover hook signatures, demos, and usage patterns directly from the docs.
Category & Scope

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "zyqzyq-unfour": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "zyqzyq-unfour"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "childrentime-reactuse": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@reactuses/mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons