YTDL RMCP vs Immich Photo Manager

In-depth architectural comparison of the YTDL RMCP and Immich Photo Manager MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose YTDL RMCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: youtube_search, youtube_search_ui, youtube_download.

Explore YTDL RMCP Details

Choose Immich Photo Manager when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Search, Albums, Tags.

Explore Immich Photo Manager Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	YTDL RMCP Multimedia Process	Immich Photo Manager drolosoft Multimedia Process
Summary	yt-dlp search, download, metadata, delivery, and Plex workflows over MCP and CLI.	Turn your self-hosted Immich photo library into a conversation — natural language search via CLIP, geographic album curation from GPS data, cross-source duplicate detection with perceptual hashing, library health reports, and offline-ready interactive HTML galleries. Claude Code plugin with 21 MCP tools, 11 skills, and 5 slash commands.
Category & Scope

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ytdl-rmcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@dinglebear/rytdl"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "drolosoft-immich-photo-manager": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "route"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons