Auth Fetch MCP vs Real Browser MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Auth Fetch MCP and Real Browser MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Auth Fetch MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: auth_fetch, download_media, list_pages.

Explore Auth Fetch MCP Details

Choose Real Browser MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Controls an existing Chrome session, Preserves active cookies and SSO sessions, Connects through a Chrome extension and localhost WebSocket.

Explore Real Browser MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Auth Fetch MCP ymw0407 Browser Automation	Real Browser MCP ofershap Browser Automation
Summary
Category & Scope	Browser Automation	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ymw0407-auth-fetch-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "auth-fetch-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ofershap-real-browser-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "real-browser-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons