What is the key difference between Yault AESP and ProofFlow?

Yault AESP belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution, while ProofFlow belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Yault AESP or ProofFlow in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Yault AESP and ProofFlow free or paid?

Yault AESP operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). ProofFlow operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Yault AESP lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. ProofFlow lists 0 tools with 1 views and 49 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Yault AESP and ProofFlow together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Yault AESP vs ProofFlow

In-depth architectural comparison of the Yault AESP and ProofFlow MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Yault AESP

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

ProofFlow

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 43/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Yault AESP if you need specialized Security tools running via a local process. Choose ProofFlow if your workspace requires Security integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Yault AESP when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Yault AESP Details

Choose ProofFlow when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ProofFlow Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Y Yault AESP Security	ProofFlow Security
Summary	Policy-gated vault operations (deposit, redeem, transfer, balance) for AI agents	Audit infrastructure for AI coding agents with evidence-backed review and policy gates.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Yault AESP Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

ProofFlow Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Yault AESP Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "yault-aesp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "yault-aesp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

ProofFlow Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "proofflow": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "proofflow-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Yault AESP is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, ProofFlow belongs to Security using local stdio subprocess. Select Yault AESP when you need capabilities focused on security and ProofFlow when you require tools for security.

More alternatives to Yault AESP More alternatives to ProofFlow Security category hub Canonical compare URL