PersonalizationMCP vs SandBase CLI

In-depth architectural comparison of the PersonalizationMCP and SandBase CLI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose PersonalizationMCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aggregators domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: OAuth2 authentication with automatic token detection and refresh, Platform-specific integrations for Steam, YouTube, Bilibili, Spotify, and Reddit, Unified onboarding and management commands for setup and operation.

Explore PersonalizationMCP Details

S

Choose SandBase CLI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aggregators domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: other (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: sandbase_discover, sandbase_inspect, sandbase_run.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	PersonalizationMCP YangLiangwei Aggregators	S SandBase CLI Aggregators
Summary
Category & Scope	Aggregators	Aggregators
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "yangliangwei-personalizationmcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "bilibili-api"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sandbase-cli": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "https"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons