Xcode MCP Bridge Wrapper vs Roast My Design System

In-depth architectural comparison of the Xcode MCP Bridge Wrapper and Roast My Design System MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Xcode MCP Bridge Wrapper when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Xcode MCP Bridge Wrapper Details

R

Choose Roast My Design System when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Roast My Design System Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Xcode MCP Bridge Wrapper Developer Tools	R Roast My Design System Developer Tools
Summary	Python wrapper that makes Xcode's MCP bridge compatible with strict MCP clients like Cursor	Audit your Design System and serve your Agent the rules that keep AI-written UI on-system.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "xcode-mcp-bridge-wrapper": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--refresh",
        "--from",
        "mcpbridge-wrapper[webui]",
        "mcpbridge-wrapper"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "roast-my-design-system-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "shadcn"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons