WpfPilot MCP vs How Persistence Works

In-depth architectural comparison of the WpfPilot MCP and How Persistence Works MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose WpfPilot MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore WpfPilot MCP Details

Choose How Persistence Works when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore How Persistence Works Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	WpfPilot MCP Developer Tools	How Persistence Works Developer Tools
Summary	Automate Windows WPF apps from AI agents with semantic UIA selectors and FlaUI test generation.	Visual Desktop Bridge - Give any AI full control over Windows to automate apps and inputs.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "wpfpilot-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@skuzadev/wpfpilot-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bridge-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "fastmcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons