Word vs Aigroup Mdtoword MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Word and Aigroup Mdtoword MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

W

Choose Word when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Word Details

Choose Aigroup Mdtoword MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Aigroup Mdtoword MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	W Word Developer Tools	Aigroup Mdtoword MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Microsoft Word automation for AI assistants. Requires Word for Windows.	本地 Markdown 到 Word 文档转换工具，支持最新 MCP 协议特性、完整的页眉页脚页码功能、增强的表格功能、数据导入和数学公式支持，修复本地相对路径图片嵌入问题
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "word": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@vscode/vsce"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aigroup-mdtoword-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "aigroup-mdtoword-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons