Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
WOCLUB Protocol Gym vs Zetesis
In-depth architectural comparison of the WOCLUB Protocol Gym and Zetesis MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
WOCLUB Protocol Gym
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 33/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Zetesis
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose WOCLUB Protocol Gym if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Zetesis if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
W
Choose WOCLUB Protocol Gym when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Z
Choose Zetesis when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
WOCLUB Protocol Gym Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Zetesis Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
WOCLUB Protocol Gym Configuration
Zetesis Configuration