WOCLUB Protocol Gym vs Zabbix API MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the WOCLUB Protocol Gym and Zabbix API MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

W

Choose WOCLUB Protocol Gym when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore WOCLUB Protocol Gym Details

Choose Zabbix API MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Zabbix API MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	W WOCLUB Protocol Gym Developer Tools	Zabbix API MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Free daily constraint challenges with deterministic evaluation for AI agents.	MCP server for the Zabbix API — daily brief, problems, hosts, items
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "woclub-protocol-gym": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "woclub-protocol-gym"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "zabbix-api-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "zapi-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons