Llm Token Tracker vs MCP Memory Graph

In-depth architectural comparison of the Llm Token Tracker and MCP Memory Graph MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Llm Token Tracker when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: track_usage, get_current_session, get_usage.

Explore Llm Token Tracker Details

Choose MCP Memory Graph when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Freemium).
• Primary tools included: SQLite-based persistent local memory, Hybrid semantic and keyword search, Knowledge graph for linked entities and memories.

Explore MCP Memory Graph Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Llm Token Tracker wn01011 Finance & Fintech	MCP Memory Graph Finance & Fintech
Summary
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "wn01011-llm-token-tracker": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "llm-token-tracker"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-memory-graph-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-memory-graph"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons