Evaluates AI outputs and models for trust, safety, compliance, privacy, cost, bias, and security risks.
Copy the AI prompt to install this server into Claude Code, Cursor, or another agent — or use 1-click editor setup below.
We haven't yet run this listing's install command through our automated sandbox check. This isn't a red flag — we're steadily working through the catalog.
💡 Paste the JSON block into your client's configuration file under mcpServers, then restart the application.
Inspect callable tools, capabilities, and parameters exposed to AI agents by WhitePact.
rai_scanDetect and redact PII + harmful content before it reaches a log
rai_trust_scoreComposite AI Trust Score (0-100) across 6 governance dimensions
rai_complianceNIST AI RMF / EU AI Act / ISO 42001 compliance evaluation
rai_hallucinationHallucination risk from hedging, consistency, unsupported claims
rai_cost_estimateUSD cost of a model API call from token counts
rai_redteam_payloadsAdversarial attack payloads (prompt injection, jailbreak, etc.)
The WhitePact MCP server provides MCP-accessible checks for AI governance workflows. Its tools evaluate model outputs, model behavior, and governance state rather than performing general-purpose application actions. Results cover trust, privacy, harmful content, hallucination risk, bias, compliance, cost, security testing, drift, incidents, and organizational status.
The server can redact personally identifiable information and harmful content before text reaches a log. It can also inspect streamed output chunks, check responses against policy rules, and create structured incident records for audit or SIEM workflows. For model and vendor review, it supports trust scoring, passport generation, third-party Trust Index lookups, compliance classification, and ISO 42001 gap analysis.
MCP clients call named rai_ tools with the text, model information, scores, token counts, policy details, or evaluation data required by each operation. Trust scoring combines six governance dimensions into a 0–100 result, while comparison and drift tools use multiple evaluations to identify differences or change over time.
Red-team workflows generate adversarial payloads and analyze the resulting model responses. Benchmark tools provide prompts or score responses against TruthfulQA, BBQ, and HellaSwag suites. Cost and routing tools estimate call costs, compare spending with budgets, and identify a lower-cost model that can handle a task according to the supplied cost and quality information.
The WhitePact MCP server does not require an LLM call for the governance decision path described by the project. Its governance platform also supports five decision outcomes—allow, allow with redaction, require approval, deny, and quarantine—but the listed MCP tools primarily expose individual evaluation and reporting functions.
The project targets Python 3.11 or newer. Install the published package using its documented distribution name:
Optional extras are available for PostgreSQL, Redis, OpenTelemetry, OpenAI, Anthropic, or the complete feature set. The package distribution is rai-governance-platform, while the Python import name is responsibleai; installing whitepact is not the documented installation method.
The MCP server supports stdio, Streamable HTTP, and legacy HTTP+SSE transport modes. The provided material does not specify required environment variables or a client-specific configuration file. The wider package can also run a dashboard with Uvicorn, but that is separate from choosing and connecting an MCP transport.
Available capabilities include:
Most tools evaluate information supplied by the caller; they do not themselves establish that a model is safe or compliant in every deployment context. The third-party Trust Index lookup is distinct from the other tools: it checks an external model or tool before an agent invokes it, while the remaining evaluations concern output or governance data provided by the caller.
The material does not document required credentials, environment variables, exact MCP launch commands, or per-tool input schemas. Compliance and benchmark results should therefore be interpreted according to the inputs and evaluation method used by the surrounding application.
Factual signals from GitHub, npm, and our automated checks — not a rating.
No reviews yet — be the first to share how this listing worked for you.
Showcase your server listing on GitHub or your project documentation. Embed this dynamic SVG badge to highlight official listing status and live engagement.
[](https://allmcps.com/mcp/whitepact)<a href="https://allmcps.com/mcp/whitepact"><img src="https://allmcps.com/api/badge/whitepact?style=directory" alt="WhitePact on AllMCPs" /></a>