AI visibility + site audits: see if ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude & Gemini recommend a website.
Copy the AI prompt to install this server into Claude Code, Cursor, or another agent β or use 1-click editor setup below.
We haven't yet run this listing's install command through our automated sandbox check. This isn't a red flag β we're steadily working through the catalog.
π‘ Paste the JSON block into your client's configuration file under mcpServers, then restart the application.
Inspect callable tools, capabilities, and parameters exposed to AI agents by Website Auditor.
get_sample_auditA complete sample report for `example.com` in the exact shape a real audit returns. Needs no API key, no subscription and no network. Try this first to see what you'd be buying.
get_ai_visibilityCurrent AI-visibility score (0β100) + per-engine breakdown (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) + the top competitor appearing in your place. Pro subscribers also get `trend`: 7- and 30-day score movement from stored snapshot history for the question this audit asked, ending at its snapshot and coβ¦
run_auditFull one-time audit β category scores (AI visibility, SEO, security, performance) + top issues + a shareable report URL.
get_changesWhat changed in the AI-visibility score β the change in the overall score and the per-engine score changes, for engines measured both times, the overall only when the same engines answered both snapshots (else it is null with an `overall_note` naming which answered each, and the per-engine changesβ¦
compare_competitorsHead-to-head AI-visibility ranking against named competitor domains + where each appears that you don't. Quota-aware: caps the audit fan-out to your remaining daily quota, reuses recent cached audits, and reports any competitors it had to skip rather than dropping them silently.
track_siteStart (or stop) weekly monitoring of a site's AI visibility. Its weekly re-audits join the history `get_changes` reads from, which audits accrue tracked or not β monitoring watches a site, it does not enable `get_changes`.
An MCP server for website-auditor.io β AI-visibility (GEO) and site-audit tools you can call from any MCP client (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and other agents).
Ask an agent "does ChatGPT recommend my business?", "what's my AI-visibility score?", "audit example.com", or "how do I stack up against my competitors?" and it answers with real data β an overall AI-visibility score (0β100), a per-engine breakdown across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini, a full site audit (SEO, security, performance), competitor comparisons, and ongoing monitoring.
The server is a thin, authenticated wrapper over the Website Auditor API β the audit engine, AI-visibility scoring and monitoring live in that service; this server just makes them available to agents.
| Tool | Tier | What it does |
|---|---|---|
get_sample_audit | Free β no key | A complete sample report for example.com in the exact shape a real audit returns. Needs no API key, no subscription and no network. Try this first to see what you'd be buying. |
get_ai_visibility | Pro | Current AI-visibility score (0β100) + per-engine breakdown (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) + the top competitor appearing in your place. Pro subscribers also get trend: 7- and 30-day score movement from stored snapshot history for the question this audit asked, ending at its snapshot and compared only between measured snapshots that asked it, the overall further only between endpoints the same engines answered (a window engines differed over carries its engine deltas and an overall_note saying which answered each; null, with a note, when the audit stored no measured snapshot). |
run_audit | Pro, rate-limited | Full one-time audit β category scores (AI visibility, SEO, security, performance) + top issues + a shareable report URL. |
get_changes | Pro | What changed in the AI-visibility score β the change in the overall score and the per-engine score changes, for engines measured both times, the overall only when the same engines answered both snapshots (else it is null with an overall_note naming which answered each, and the per-engine changes stand alone); competitor_changes, new_issues and resolved_issues are always empty. Only between two snapshots that asked the same question (the same business name, market and queries), read from the domain's series: its measured weekly re-audits and any audit that asked the same question as the newest recorded one, while it has no gap longer than four weeks and a day from the newest weekly re-audit that recorded its question, through each later snapshot of the series (weekly re-audits included, recorded or not), to the newest measured snapshot. When there is no such pair it says why instead of a number, with the date the series re-baselined when it did. The domain need not be tracked: history accrues from any audit of it, tracked or not β track_site adds the weekly re-audits to the series, it is not a precondition. |
compare_competitors | Pro | Head-to-head AI-visibility ranking against named competitor domains + where each appears that you don't. Quota-aware: caps the audit fan-out to your remaining daily quota, reuses recent cached audits, and reports any competitors it had to skip rather than dropping them silently. |
track_site | Pro | Start (or stop) weekly monitoring of a site's AI visibility. Its weekly re-audits join the history get_changes reads from, which audits accrue tracked or not β monitoring watches a site, it does not enable get_changes. |
untrack_site | Pro | Stop monitoring a site and free up a monitoring slot. Idempotent. |
list_tracked_sites | Pro | List the sites you're monitoring, with cadence, active state, and slots used/remaining. |
get_monitoring_status | Pro | A glanceable dashboard across all tracked sites β latest score of each site's series (the series get_changes reads), the date of each one's last scheduled run and when the next runs, and the most recent like-for-like change (or a note, or the summary, saying why there is none), shown as its per-engine changes with a note naming the engines when different ones answered the two snapshots; like get_changes, its change carries competitor_changes, new_issues and resolved_issues, always empty. |
check_upgrade_status | Any valid key | Your own subscription standing β tier, status, period end, and what upgrading unlocks (starting Pro requires a payment method and accepting the Terms). Consumes no audit quota. |
Clients that support MCP prompts (Claude Desktop, claude.ai) render these as something you can pick from a menu, so you don't have to phrase the request yourself or know which tool to ask for. In clients that don't surface prompts (Codex, currently), nothing is lost but the menu β ask in words and the same tools run.
| Prompt | Needs a key? | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| See a sample report | No | Walks through a complete report for example.com. No arguments, no setup β one click from any install. |
| Check my AI visibility | Pro | Runs get_ai_visibility for a domain you name, then explains the score, which assistants name the business, and who is named instead. |
| Run a full site audit | Pro | Runs run_audit for a domain and summarises it by category, with the three fixes that matter most. |
| Compare me to a competitor | Pro | Runs compare_competitors for your domain against a named rival, and explains where they get named and you don't. |
Each Pro prompt falls back to get_sample_audit when no API key is configured,
so you always get output rather than an error.
get_ai_visibility and run_audit both accept two optional arguments that
decide what question the AI-visibility check actually asks.
compare_competitors accepts business_location only β see below for why it
takes no name:
| Argument | Omitted | Supplied |
|---|---|---|
business_name | Detected from the site, and flagged with name_warning when it could not be verified | Taken as fact and recorded as caller-supplied β which suppresses the warning |
business_location | Detected from the site; if nothing is found the questions widen to the country, or drop the place entirely | Scopes the questions to that place |
Supply a name only when you actually know it. A supplied name overrides detection and is treated as confirmed, so a guess is scored exactly as if a human had verified it β and silences the warning that would have told you otherwise. Leaving it out is the safer default: detection is transparent about its own uncertainty.
The same applies to location, in the other direction. Omitting it is correct for a national or global business and wrong for a local one, since a local business measured without a place is measured against the wrong queries.
On compare_competitors: it takes business_location and applies it to
your site and every competitor, because a comparison asks about one market β
scoring you locally while scoring your rivals globally would rank the answers
to two different questions. It deliberately takes no business_name: a name
identifies one business, and forwarding yours to your competitors would score
every one of them as you. The result names the market it used, so a scoped
comparison is never mistaken for a global one.
The server runs directly via npx β no clone or build required.
Try it before you buy it. Install with no API key at all and ask your agent
for a sample audit β get_sample_audit returns a full report for example.com
in the exact format a real run produces, so you can check the shape fits your
needs first.
Pricing. Auditing real domains needs a Website Auditor subscription at
$10/month β eligible new customers get a 7-day free trial (payment
method required to start; no charge until the trial ends; customers who used
a trial in the last 12 months are billed immediately). Sign up and create an
API key at
api.website-auditor.io/admin_portal,
then set it as WA_API_KEY below. There is no free API tier β a key only
functions with an active subscription.
Claude Desktop (claude_desktop_config.json), Cursor
(~/.cursor/mcp.json), and most other clients use the same mcpServers shape:
Claude Code β add it from the CLI:
Codex β the CLI, IDE extension and ChatGPT desktop app all read the same
~/.codex/config.toml, so one of these covers all three:
Codex doesn't render MCP prompts, so the Prompts above won't appear as menu entries there β ask in words instead ("show me a sample audit").
Or install the packaged Codex plugin, which bundles the same server and restores the prompts as skills (which Codex does render):
Cursor β one-click install, or put the same mcpServers JSON as above in
~/.cursor/mcp.json:
Factual signals from GitHub, npm, and our automated checks β not a rating.
No reviews yet β be the first to share how this listing worked for you.
Showcase your server listing on GitHub or your project documentation. Embed this dynamic SVG badge to highlight official listing status and live engagement.
[](https://allmcps.com/mcp/website-auditor)<a href="https://allmcps.com/mcp/website-auditor"><img src="https://allmcps.com/api/badge/website-auditor?style=directory" alt="Website Auditor on AllMCPs" /></a>