WaveGuard vs Contabo (VPS) MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the WaveGuard and Contabo (VPS) MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

W

Choose WaveGuard when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore WaveGuard Details

Choose Contabo (VPS) MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Contabo (VPS) MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	W WaveGuard Developer Tools	Contabo (VPS) MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Anomaly detection API powered by physics simulation. Scan any data for outliers.	Contabo API (v1.0.0) as MCP tools for cloud provisioning, and management. Powered by HAPI MCP server
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "waveguard": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "waveguard"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "contabo-vps-mcp-server": {
      "url": "https://run.mcp.com.ai"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons