Visily vs MetaMask Embedded Wallets (Web3Auth) MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Visily and MetaMask Embedded Wallets (Web3Auth) MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

V

Choose Visily when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_design_context, get_screenshot, get_board_theme.

Explore Visily Details

Choose MetaMask Embedded Wallets (Web3Auth) MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_docs, get_doc, get_example.

Explore MetaMask Embedded Wallets (Web3Auth) MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	V Visily Developer Tools	MetaMask Embedded Wallets (Web3Auth) MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Use Visily designs in AI coding agents for code, discovery, and theme tokens.	Helps AI coding agents integrate MetaMask Embedded Wallets (Web3Auth) SDKs.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "visily": {
      "url": "https://app.visily.ai/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "metamask-embedded-wallets-web3auth-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons