Viral.app vs Social → Context

In-depth architectural comparison of the Viral.app and Social → Context MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

V

Choose Viral.app when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Viral.app Details

Choose Social → Context when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Social → Context Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	V Viral.app Social Media	Social → Context Social Media
Summary	UGC and creator campaign analytics for TikTok, Instagram and YouTube: tracking, tags, live lookups.	Turn a TikTok/Instagram/YouTube link into text for your AI: metadata, transcript and image OCR.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "viral-app": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "viral-app"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "social-context": {
      "url": "https://api.mcp.ai/p_socialdl"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons