Video Editing AI MCP vs Rivemcp

In-depth architectural comparison of the Video Editing AI MCP and Rivemcp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Video Editing AI MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Video Editing AI MCP Details

Choose Rivemcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Rivemcp Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Video Editing AI MCP Multimedia Process	Rivemcp Multimedia Process
Summary	Video Editing Ai MCP server. Tools: split scenes, generate subtitles, thumbnail data. Built by MEOK	MCP server for creating and editing Rive (.riv) animation files. 139 tools for AI-driven animation.
Category & Scope	Multimedia Process	Multimedia Process

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "video-editing-ai-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "video-editing-ai-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rivemcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "rivemcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons