AI-coding validation gates: reality checks with veto plus ISO/IEC 25010 review, before code ships.
Copy the AI prompt to install this server into Claude Code, Cursor, or another agent β or use 1-click editor setup below.
We haven't yet run this listing's install command through our automated sandbox check. This isn't a red flag β we're steadily working through the catalog.
π‘ Paste the JSON block into your client's configuration file under mcpServers, then restart the application.
Inspect callable tools, capabilities, and parameters exposed to AI agents by Verificate MCP.
validate_ai_outputBinary **approve/reject** verdict + severity-ranked findings
validate_planBinary **approve/reject** verdict + findings
analyze_codeScores + findings, deliberately **no verdict
generate_codeGated code (no placeholders, no invented APIs)
Real output from the live server: 12 lines of AI-written payment code β rejected, fixed, approved, in seconds.
You vibe-coded the demo. This ships it. Between a working demo and a launched product used to stand an experienced CTO and a senior dev team β the people who catch the mock refund path, the invented SDK call, the loop that dies at real traffic. Verificate MCP is that review team as an MCP server: 17 deterministic reality gates with veto power, fused with a frontier-model enterprise review (ISO/IEC 25010: performance, scalability, reliability), run on every AI-written change before it reaches your codebase. The AI writes; the gate holds the bar; you ship. Hosted, zero-install, binary verdict in seconds β in Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf or any MCP client.
Not another linter wrapper. The code-quality shelf on every MCP directory is two things: scanners (ESLint, Semgrep and SonarQube bridges β deterministic rules, no judgment) and prompt relays that pipe your repo to your own LLM key (self-review with extra steps). Verificate is neither: the gates hold veto power that no model output can override.
Your coding assistant writes a mock and calls it done. It invents an SDK call that doesn't exist. It ships an N+1 loop that passes every test and dies under load. Verificate MCP runs the deep review pass on every AI output β deterministic reality gates first (any one can veto), then an enterprise-grade review scores what survives β before the code reaches your codebase.
12 plausible lines of AI-written payment code were sent through the production gateway. Verdict: REJECTED β score 30.8/100, vetoed by code_reality_gate, with findings including:
"N+1 synchronous API calls β¦ For 100 items, this results in 100 sequential HTTP roundtrips, taking ~10β20 seconds and blocking the event loop/worker thread β¦ will trigger Stripe rate limiting (100 req/sec limit)." "
stripe.Inventoryis not a valid Stripe SDK resource." "Floating-point representation issues lead to rounding errors in financial transactions; Stripe API requires integer cents."
Each of those is an afternoon of production debugging, caught in seconds.
A frontier model asked "is this OK to merge?" in a natural workflow missed reward-gaming (a test
that only does assert True) and a hallucinated API (stripe.Refund.create_partial) in 0 of 6
runs each. Verificate's gate caught both 6 of 6 β deterministically, with 0 false positives
on clean code.
| Adversarial case | LLM review alone | Verificate gate |
|---|---|---|
Reward-gaming (assert True test) | 0 / 6 | 6 / 6 |
| Hallucinated API (nonexistent SDK call) | 0 / 6 | 6 / 6 |
Battle-tested: 2,581 audited validations over 5 weeks (66 rejected, 270 flagged unfit),
including guarding the write-path of a 21M-entity source-cited knowledge base (98.6% cited,
100% licensed across 268 sources). Reproduce it: scripts/ Β· full write-up: COMPARISON.md.
Each tool has one job β two gates that return verdicts, one advisor that doesn't, one generator:
| Tool | Job | Returns |
|---|---|---|
validate_ai_output | The merge gate for AI-written code. Deterministic reality gates (mock/placeholder veto, gaming & bypass detection, invented-API checks) run first and can't be overridden; ISO/IEC 25010 review scores what survives. | Binary approve/reject verdict + severity-ranked findings |
validate_plan | The gate for plans and designs, before any code exists β completeness, feasibility, scalability implications, risk. The cheapest place to catch a bad design. | Binary approve/reject verdict + findings |
analyze_code | Advisory deep-dive on existing code β hot paths, rate-limit math, failure modes, tech debt. Use it to understand a rejection or review inherited code. | Scores + findings, deliberately no verdict |
generate_code | Generate + gate in one step β the LLM writes it, the same protection engine vets it before you see it. | Gated code (no placeholders, no invented APIs) |
The server also ships prompts and resources for a richer client experience:
gate_my_changes / review_my_plan β one-click workflows that loop validate β fix β re-validate until approved.verificate://gates (what each of the 17 deterministic gates watches for) and verificate://example-verdict (a verbatim production rejection).Every machine gets 25 free validations β no account, no card, no key. Add the URL and go:
Claude Code
Cursor / VS Code β one-click install:
LM Studio and Goose one-click buttons are at https://verificate.ai/mcp (GitHub strips their custom-protocol links).
Windsurf / any MCP client (JSON)
Cursor: ~/.cursor/mcp.json. Windsurf: ~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json.
Then ask your assistant to "validate this function with verificate" β a structured verdict comes back in seconds, and every free-tier response shows how many validations you have left and what the gate has caught for you.
Sign up at https://verificate.ai/auth/signup (30-day trial, no card β then $30/mo) and add your token to the same config:
or in the JSON config add "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_TRIAL_TOKEN" }.
Tools an agent may call are tools it will skip under pressure. Add a standing rule (Claude Code: CLAUDE.md; Cursor: a rule file):
One-paste setup prompts that install these rules for you: PROMPTS.md. Or wire it into CI as a merge gate β see examples/.
The two stages are deliberately separate: if reality and quality were blended into one score, a beautifully structured function that fakes its refund path could still average out to "acceptable." A veto architecture makes that impossible.
Everything else on the MCP code-quality shelf is free β and that's fair, because a wrapper should be free. What you can't get for free is judgment with authority:
| What you'll find on the directories | What it is | What it structurally can't do |
|---|---|---|
| Linter wrappers β ESLint MCP, Semgrep MCP, SonarQube MCP | Rule-based scanners exposed as MCP tools. Deterministic, free, worth running. | No judgment. Rules can't know the refund function never calls the payment provider, or that stripe.Inventory doesn't exist. No verdict, no veto β findings your agent is free to ignore. |
Factual signals from GitHub, npm, and our automated checks β not a rating.
No reviews yet β be the first to share how this listing worked for you.
Showcase your server listing on GitHub or your project documentation. Embed this dynamic SVG badge to highlight official listing status and live engagement.
[](https://allmcps.com/mcp/verificate-mcp)<a href="https://allmcps.com/mcp/verificate-mcp"><img src="https://allmcps.com/api/badge/verificate-mcp?style=directory" alt="Verificate MCP on AllMCPs" /></a>