Vaquill vs Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide
In-depth architectural comparison of the Vaquill and Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Vaquill
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 55/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Vaquill if you need specialized Legal tools running via a local process. Choose Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide if your workspace requires Legal integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Vaquill when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Vaquill is categorized under Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide belongs to Legal using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Vaquill when you need capabilities focused on legal and Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide when you require tools for legal.
Browse the statutory hierarchy one level at a time.
list_statutes_coverage
Self-describing coverage matrix: which corpora exist in which jurisdiction.
get_section_neighbors
The sections immediately before and after, in statutory order.
get_section_definitions
The defined terms that govern a section, from its chapter's definitions section.
get_section_cited_by
Which USC/CFR sections cross-reference this one (the inverse of `crossReferences`).
get_section_cross_state
Provisions in other states addressing the same subject, ranked by similarity.
get_section_changes
What our refreshes observed changing on this section over time.
+15 more tools listed on main page
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide Tools (6)
search
Volltextsuche mit Lucene-Syntax. Filter nach Entscheiddatum, Scrape-Datum, Hierarchie (Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) und Sprache. Sortierung nach Relevanz, Entscheiddatum oder Scrape-Datum. Paginierung über `next_cursor` / `search_after`. Aggregationen für Facetten-Auswertung.
search_by_case_number
Exakte Phrasensuche nach Geschäftsnummern, Aktenzeichen und BGE-Zitaten (z.B. `BGE 142 III 1`, `6B_1234/2025`, `5A_396/2015`). Setzt die Nummer automatisch in Anführungszeichen.
fetch_document
Vollständigen Entscheid samt Volltext anhand der ID abrufen.
list_hierarchy
Hierarchie-IDs (Bund / Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) mit Trefferzahlen.
list_facets
Hierarchischer Facetten-Baum mit lokalisierten Labels in DE/FR/IT.
server_info
Versions- und Konfigurationsinformationen.
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide vs MCP Saos