Valet vs Hocr MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Valet and Hocr MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Valet when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Freemium).

Explore Valet Details

Choose Hocr MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: FastAPI-based MCP server, Vue.js frontend for image upload, Integration with vision-language model for formula extraction.

Explore Hocr MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Valet Developer Tools	Hocr MCP Server Wooonster Developer Tools
Summary	Get share links, publish and manage websites, artifacts and agents. No account needed.	A fastAPI-based FastMCP server with a Vue frontend that sends uploaded images to VLM via the MCP to quickly extract handwritten mathematical formulas as clean LaTeX code.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "valet": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "wooonster-hocr-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "wooonster-hocr-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons