Uxgen vs Harukibox

uxgen_image

THE MATERIAL OF THE PAGE — scene OR packshot. Start with `emploi` and `categorie`: two words, and the prompt is written to the codes of that sector (background, light, human presence, set density, a quiet zone measured for the headline). 🚨 IT DOES NOT ONLY DO PACKSHOTS: a free `prompt` + `cutout: false` produces THE SCENE (dining room, consulting room, workbench, shopfront) — the trades with no object to cut out need exactly that. `cutout: true` = the cut-out packshot chain. It writes the image to disk, cut out once, trimmed, framed to the ratio, in WebP, and returns the <img> tag with its real dimensions. LIGHTING IS GRADED AND MEASURED AUTOMATICALLY: do not write "soft light" or "cream background", you would switch back on what the chain switches off. The details of the grading, of the uses and of the categories are returned IN THE RESPONSE.

uxgen_render

RENDERS YOUR PAGE AND GIVES YOU THE IMAGES BACK, in this response — nothing is written to any disk. Send `html` (the page content, as text) or `url`. You get the first screen and the full page at 390 and 1440 px, as real images you must OPEN and LOOK AT before you change anything. A page that was never looked at is the first cause of an ugly site. ⚠️ THE 8-FRAME SCROLL STRIP IS NOT RETURNED BY DEFAULT: measured at 698 KB for a text-only page, several MB for a real one. Ask for it with `bande: true` and it is served up to a hard weight cap, which the answer states. ⏱ Expect 10 to 25 seconds. MAKES THE PAGE VISIBLE. Call it as soon as the page is assembled, and after every visual fix, BEFORE the audit. It opens the page in headless Chrome (no server left running) and WRITES TO DISK: the first screen alone, the full page, and a strip of 8 frames captured during a scripted scroll, at 390 and 1440 px. It also returns what a screenshot cannot show: horizontal overflow per width, approximate LCP, transferred weight, images without dimensions. THE PATHS IT RETURNS MUST BE OPENED WITH YOUR IMAGE-READING TOOL: this tool does not judge for you, it hands you the view. Writing a page you never look at is the number one cause of ugly sites.

uxgen_audit

MEASURES A PAGE FOR REAL, IN HEADLESS CHROME, ON THIS SERVER — five widths (360, 390, 768, 1100, 1440), the computed styles, the scroll, and a robot that CLICKS the buying path. Send `html` (the page content, as text) or `url` (a live page). It writes NOTHING anywhere: it returns named gaps, each with the selector and the gesture that closes it, and NO score to chase. ⏱ EXPECT 45 TO 65 SECONDS. Measured 25/08 on a 2 KB page: 47 s at five widths. This is not a hang — do not retry, and tell your user it is running. 🧷 `conserver: true` — THE AUDIT OF A PAGE YOU KEEP (default after a brief in `improve` mode). It returns only what can be ADDED (a missing mechanic, each with its ANCHOR: « after the buy box », « before the footer ») or FIXED in place (a dead link, an image without dimensions, an illegible text). The rebuild families — canon sequence, grounds, radii, header grid, typography, signature gesture, animations, page length — are set aside, and the report says how many and which. It never points you to a tool this server does not run: an absent part is added with `uxgen_piece` at its anchor. MEASURES the page and RETURNS NAMED GAPS. A real audit in headless Chrome at 360, 390, 768, 1100 and 1440 px, on a block (`blockId`), an HTML file (`path`) or a URL (`url`). It returns the profile it used and every gap with its SELECTOR, its WEIGHT and THE GESTURE that closes it, most expensive first. 🚨 AUDIT THE PAGE, NOT THE BLOCKS: colors, radii, breathing room and distance to the price only show up on the assembled page. 🚨 NO SCORE, NO THRESHOLD, NO GO-AHEAD, and that is deliberate: nothing to clear, nothing to push up. YOU are the one who decides to ship, after LOOKING at the screenshots. Fix by the GESTURE the gap names, never by pushing a number. The response stays under 10,000 characters and SAYS what it leaves out; the full report is written next to the page in `_bloom-audit/`.

uxgen_ameliorer

⛔ NOT AVAILABLE ON THIS HOSTED SERVER — do not call it, it will refuse. WHAT IT DOES WHERE IT RUNS: it ADJUSTS THE CSS OF ONE SECTION — one to five scoped rules — and NEVER ADDS A SECTION. It is not the tool that adds a missing mechanic. WHY IT REFUSES HERE: its judge is a VISION MODEL and no vision key is configured, and its engine is not deployed on this server; a tool that "improves" a page without looking at it would be inventing its corrections. TO IMPROVE AN EXISTING PAGE: `uxgen_brief` in `improve` mode, then `uxgen_audit` with `conserver: true` — it names what to ADD and where — and `uxgen_piece` at the anchor. 🎯 THE ONLY EXTERNAL JUDGE IN THE PRODUCT, ~30 SECONDS BY DEFAULT. It is the only piece of the chain that says whether the page is BEAUTIFUL — uxgen_audit only says whether it is clean. At scope "pli" (THE DEFAULT) it judges the first screen at 390 px only: 2 to 3 vision calls, ~0.004 $. `portee: "page"` takes the whole page: ~50 calls, 20 to 40 minutes. HOW IT JUDGES: each section is captured ALONE and submitted to an external vision model that returns NO SCORE — what is wrong, what it costs, and the CSS gesture with its values. The gesture is applied, the section recaptured, and both images go back to the judge IN A RANDOMISED ORDER: if it does not pick the new one, THE GESTURE IS REVERTED. ⚠ LOOK AT THE before|after BOARDS it writes, with your image-reading tool, before you announce anything at all.

uxgen_status

🚨 DO NOT CALL THIS TO GET YOUR BEARINGS: the path is returned by uxgen_brief, and this response is LONG (~5,500 tokens; "complet" makes it ~14,700). Two uses, and only two. (1) RESUME a build already started: with "projectDir" it reads bloom.json and returns the brand, the committed style, the images produced, the current step — the answer to "where were we?" without asking anything again. (2) DIAGNOSE a refusal: licence and tier, credits left, whether the image key is present, manifests in error. When a tool refuses to run, the cause is here. On a brand-new page, this call teaches you nothing.

uxgen_packshot

PUTS THE BRAND'S OWN LABEL ON A PRODUCT SHOT, and returns the produced image IN THIS RESPONSE — nothing is written to any disk. Send the photograph as `photoBase64` (raw base64, no `data:` prefix) or `photoUrl`. It checks the subject really is that product and REFUSES a dirty result rather than shipping it. COMPOSES THE CLIENT'S PRODUCT ONTO A REAL PHOTOGRAPH. It takes a studio photograph of a container with a BLANK WHITE label, detects the edges of that label at pixel level, and inlays the brand's label with a `multiply` blend: the drop shadow and the curve of the cylinder pass through the artwork, so the jar stays believable. THE FONT IS MANDATORY AND IT IS THE SITE'S FONT. No fallback — with no font, no brand or no ink, the tool REFUSES rather than printing something generic. 🚨 IT TAKES TWO CALLS. First call without `zone`: it detects, writes the proof image (magenta rectangle) and REFUSES, handing you the four numbers. You OPEN the proof. Second call with `zone`: it composes. Detection on its own mistakes a label for a blank screen or a tablecloth — composing without looking means printing the brand onto a scrap of tablecloth. 🚨 The label lives INSIDE the image, never on top of it: an HTML text overlay laid over the photo to fake a label is a named gap (V3, uxgen_audit).

uxgen_publier

THE LAST GATE BEFORE YOU ANNOUNCE IT IS DONE — and on this hosted server it PUBLISHES NOTHING: it returns the verdict and the CONTENT to write, and YOU write the file. Send `html`. It refuses a page that carries a third party's legal identity, an invented customer review, an invented activity figure, a hand-redrawn third-party logo, two different current prices for one product, or two different dark grounds. 🔴 IT NOW REQUIRES THE RENDER SEAL. Call `uxgen_render` on the EXACT html you are about to publish, OPEN the images, then pass its `rendu` field back here unchanged. Without it the page is REFUSED — until today the absence of render data DISARMED the checks instead of refusing, which is the opposite of a guard rail. A page assembled outside the chain (taken from the merchant site, hand-written) passes with a written `motifHorsChaine`: a written reason passes, silence does not. ⚠️ The seal proves the RENDER happened on this page, never that anyone LOOKED at it. A refusal is not a failure of the tool: it names the reason, and the content it returns is then a DRAFT — write it to a `.brouillon.html` with a noindex, never to the publishable path. CALL THIS BEFORE ANNOUNCING THAT IT IS DONE, on the page you have just written. It refuses to write the page to the publishable path if it carries a third party's legal identity, an invented customer review, an invented activity statistic, a THIRD-PARTY BRAND LOGO REDRAWN BY HAND, two different current prices for the same product, or two different dark grounds. A refusal destroys nothing: the draft goes to ".brouillon.html" with a noindex, and whatever already sat at the publishable path stays INTACT. 🛒 A MULTI-ITEM SHOP HAS TO BE DECLARED: as soon as the page carries the commerce configuration written by `uxgen_theme` (two real items or more), prices are counted PRODUCT BY PRODUCT. This is not an exemption: WITHIN one product, two current prices reject the page exactly as they would on a single-product page. With no configuration, the page is judged as single-product.

uxgen_seo

Turns one seed keyword into an SEO PLAN built on live Google data: the keywords around it, their monthly traffic, their difficulty, who currently holds the top of each result page, and what to write to take it. It is a plan, not a report: every target comes back with the format Google is already rewarding on that query, read from the live result page rather than guessed. The search-data key lives on the uxgen server and never reaches you: you call this tool, the server calls the provider. Included from the Pack plan upwards, with a monthly allowance in dollars; one plan costs about 0.020 $ of it. When that allowance or the platform budget is spent, the refusal says so, says when it reopens, and carries `reessayable`: it is a decision, not an outage, and everything else on uxgen keeps working.

uxgen_piece

One part of the library, in the format your target wants: `format:"html"` (default) gives the self-contained HTML and the prompt that built it; `format:"liquid"` gives the SAME part as a Shopify theme section — {% schema %}, settings, presets — with the filename it goes under and the template entry to write. Give the id `uxgen_catalogue` showed you (CAPTCHA-01, PANIER-03...). Free accounts open 10 parts; a paid plan opens all 173. A locked part answers with a refusal that carries the checkout link: it is a decision, not an outage.

uxgen_demarrer

⚠️ REMOTE SERVER — THE RECIPE COMES BACK IN THE ANSWER, IT IS NOT WRITTEN TO YOUR DISK. Read it, fill it with your file editor, and pass it back to `uxgen_poser` as `recette`. Everything below is true of this tool; only the delivery differs. PREMIER GESTE, avant toute ligne de code : donnez la phrase du client telle quelle, sans rien lui demander de plus. Rend le squelette choisi, l’univers de couleur, et un gabarit de recette sur disque où il ne reste que des textes à remplacer.