Utah Open Data vs Data Winnipeg

In-depth architectural comparison of the Utah Open Data and Data Winnipeg MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Utah Open Data when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Utah Open Data Details

Choose Data Winnipeg when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Data Winnipeg Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Utah Open Data Developer Tools	Data Winnipeg Developer Tools
Summary	Utah state open data via Socrata SoQL — government, grants, health, demographics.	Winnipeg Open Data (data.winnipeg.ca) Socrata MCP.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "utah-open-data": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "utah-open-data"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "data-winnipeg": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "data-winnipeg"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons