Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
UseMyContext vs UseMyContext.ai
In-depth architectural comparison of the UseMyContext and UseMyContext.ai MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
UseMyContext
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
UseMyContext.ai
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose UseMyContext if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose UseMyContext.ai if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
U
Choose UseMyContext when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
U
Choose UseMyContext.ai when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
UseMyContext Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
UseMyContext.ai Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
UseMyContext Configuration
UseMyContext.ai Configuration