Uk Legislation MCP Server vs Translatize MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Uk Legislation MCP Server and Translatize MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

U

Choose Uk Legislation MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Uk Legislation MCP Server Details

Choose Translatize MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Translatize MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	U Uk Legislation MCP Server Developer Tools	Translatize MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Search and read UK legislation at any date, resolve citations, list amendments, track changes.	Read, search, edit and branch Translatize translation labels and fill missing translations.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "uk-legislation-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "uk-legislation-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-149": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@translatize/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons