Twelve Permissions vs FTX MCP — FactoryTalk… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Twelve Permissions vs FTX MCP — FactoryTalk Optix MCP Server
In-depth architectural comparison of the Twelve Permissions and FTX MCP — FactoryTalk Optix MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Twelve Permissions
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
FTX MCP — FactoryTalk Optix MCP Server
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 43/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Twelve Permissions if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose FTX MCP — FactoryTalk Optix MCP Server if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Twelve Permissions when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Twelve Permissions is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, FTX MCP — FactoryTalk Optix MCP Server belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Twelve Permissions when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and FTX MCP — FactoryTalk Optix MCP Server when you require tools for developer tools.