Tuqo vs Porkbun DNS

In-depth architectural comparison of the Tuqo and Porkbun DNS MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

T

Choose Tuqo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Tuqo Details

Choose Porkbun DNS when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Porkbun DNS Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	T Tuqo Developer Tools	Porkbun DNS Developer Tools
Summary	Static hosting in Russia: sites, deploys, domains with SSL, forms, gated access, analytics via MCP.	Manage DNS records, domains, DNSSEC, SSL certificates via MCP
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tuqo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "tuqo"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "porkbun-dns": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "porkbun-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons