Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Tts vs Vox
In-depth architectural comparison of the Tts and Vox MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Tts
Text-to-Speech · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Vox
Text-to-Speech · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Tts if you need specialized Text-to-Speech tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Vox if your workspace requires Text-to-Speech integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Tts when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Text-to-Speech domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
- Primary tools included: synthesize_speech, list_voices, check_tts_service.
Choose Vox when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Text-to-Speech domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Tts Tools (3)
synthesize_speech
Convert text (≤5000 chars) to WAV speech. Params: `text`, `language` (default `pt`), `voice`, `speed` (0.5–2.0), `output_format` (`audio` \
list_voices
Full voice catalog with language, gender, accent, quality grade. Optional `language` filter
check_tts_service
Backend health status
Vox Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Tts Configuration
Vox Configuration