Traql vs Satoshkin Aml MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Traql and Satoshkin Aml MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Traql when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Traql Details

Choose Satoshkin Aml MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Satoshkin Aml MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Traql Finance & Fintech	Satoshkin Aml MCP Finance & Fintech
Summary	AML risk scoring for crypto addresses and transactions on Ethereum, BSC, TRON, TON, Bitcoin	AML/KYT crypto wallet risk screening (BitOK data) for Claude, ChatGPT and any MCP client.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "traql": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@traql/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "satoshkin-aml-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "github:satoshkin-dev/satoshkin-aml-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons