Transcribe MCP vs Uttera

In-depth architectural comparison of the Transcribe MCP and Uttera MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Transcribe MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Speech-to-Text domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: transcribe_url, find_dead_air, shop_info.

Explore Transcribe MCP Details

U

Choose Uttera when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Speech-to-Text domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Uttera Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Transcribe MCP Speech-to-Text	U Uttera Speech-to-Text
Summary	Transcribe audio/video and find dead air. Pay-per-call in USDC over x402 — no account, no key.	Audio for your agent: transcribe, speak, translate, summarise, plus sound effects and music.
Category & Scope	Speech-to-Text	Speech-to-Text
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "transcribe-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "transcribe-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "uttera": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "uttera"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons