TopoLift Negotiation vs QuReDec

In-depth architectural comparison of the TopoLift Negotiation and QuReDec MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose TopoLift Negotiation when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore TopoLift Negotiation Details

Choose QuReDec when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore QuReDec Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	TopoLift Negotiation Research	QuReDec Research
Summary	Atom-grounded negotiation reasoning. Typed topology slot, inline citations, public dialect.	Evidence-backed decision briefs with citations — recommendation, confidence, risks, sources.
Category & Scope	Research	Research
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "topolift-negotiation": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "topolift-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "quredec": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "quredec-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons