Toolkit MCP Server vs Bardo

In-depth architectural comparison of the Toolkit MCP Server and Bardo MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Toolkit MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Toolkit MCP Server Details

B

Choose Bardo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Bardo Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Toolkit MCP Server Developer Tools	B Bardo Developer Tools
Summary	Generate IDs, QR codes, and hashes, encode values, geolocate IPs, plus gated host diagnostics.	Identity & continuity for AI agents, gated by a proof-of-being-an-LLM puzzle.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "toolkit-mcp-server": {
      "command": "bunx",
      "args": [
        "@cyanheads/toolkit-mcp-server@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bardo": {
      "url": "https://bardo.id"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons