TookEffect vs InterAI Risk Oracle

In-depth architectural comparison of the TookEffect and InterAI Risk Oracle MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

T

Choose TookEffect when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore TookEffect Details

Choose InterAI Risk Oracle when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore InterAI Risk Oracle Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	T TookEffect Developer Tools	InterAI Risk Oracle Developer Tools
Summary	Independent effect verification and signed receipts for consequential AI agent actions.	Policy gate and signed trust receipts for autonomous agent actions.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tookeffect": {
      "url": "https://tookeffect.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "interai-risk-oracle": {
      "url": "https://ai-risk-oracle.fly.dev/demo"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons