Tollary Agent Transaction Guard vs Froglet

In-depth architectural comparison of the Tollary Agent Transaction Guard and Froglet MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

T

Choose Tollary Agent Transaction Guard when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Tollary Agent Transaction Guard Details

Choose Froglet when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Froglet Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	T Tollary Agent Transaction Guard Developer Tools	Froglet Developer Tools
Summary	Local fit-check and safe integration guidance for non-custodial Base USDC agent transactions.	Run hosted proofs, signed receipts, service discovery, and local install planning.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tollary-agent-transaction-guard": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "tollary"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "froglet": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "froglet-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons