Toll402 MCP vs SiGit

In-depth architectural comparison of the Toll402 MCP and SiGit MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

T

Choose Toll402 MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Version Control domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Toll402 MCP Details

Choose SiGit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Version Control domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SiGit Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	T Toll402 MCP Version Control	SiGit Version Control
Summary	Pay-per-call tools for AI agents via x402: web, PDF, provenance, trusted lookup, business directory.	MCP server for siGit (sigit.si): browse repos, search code, manage PRs/issues, web search.
Category & Scope	Version Control	Version Control
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "toll402-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "toll402-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sigit": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from",
        "sigit-code",
        "sigit"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons