Tokentrust vs Ton Jetton Risk MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Tokentrust and Ton Jetton Risk MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Tokentrust when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Tokentrust Details

Choose Ton Jetton Risk MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ton Jetton Risk MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Tokentrust Finance & Fintech	Ton Jetton Risk MCP Finance & Fintech
Summary	Verifies token/cost savings claimed by AI context-reduction proxies via MCP tools.	Token rug/honeypot risk screening: EVM (7 chains, live sell simulation), Solana, TON. Free, keyless.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tokentrust": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "tokentrust-cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ton-jetton-risk-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "github:mrvlyouknowwho/ton-jetton-risk-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons